Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking435not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUCedar Trail
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74
Boost clock speed1850 MHz400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nm32 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Shared memory++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 130V 41881
+4188000%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2024 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 3 nm 32 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 130V and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 19 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 146 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.