HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) vs Arc Graphics 130V

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.98
+1793%

Arc Graphics 130V outperforms HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) by a whopping 1793% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4261218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2012)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUIvy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)1 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHz1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology3 nm22 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus widthno data64/128 Bit
Shared memory++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.98
+1793%
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 0.58

  • Other tests
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 130V 9523
+2923%
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 315

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+2791%
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) 286

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33
+267%
9
−267%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Fortnite 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Valorant 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1373%
11
−1373%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Fortnite 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Valorant 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+1100%
4−5
−1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Valorant 100−110
+261%
27−30
−261%
Fortnite 65−70
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+4100%
2−3
−4100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+2433%
3−4
−2433%
Valorant 120−130
+1917%
6−7
−1917%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Fortnite 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60
+1867%
3−4
−1867%
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Fortnite 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 267% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is ahead in 33 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.98 0.58
Recency 24 September 2024 1 October 2012
Chip lithography 3 nm 22 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 1793.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4
9 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7
56 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.