Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD vs Arc Graphics 140V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUMontevina
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores810
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology3 nm65 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xno data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_210

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140V 54539
+37513%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 145

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2024 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 3 nm 65 nm

Arc Graphics 140V has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Arc Graphics 140V and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Arc Graphics 140V
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 254 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140V or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.