GeForce4 MX 440 vs Arc Graphics 130V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with GeForce4 MX 440, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.28
+102700%

Graphics 130V outperforms MX 440 by a whopping 102700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4581566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUNV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7no data
Core clock speedno data275 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.100
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xDDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_28.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.28
+102700%
GeForce4 MX 440 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4544
+113500%
Samples: 530
GeForce4 MX 440 4
Samples: 54

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD33-0−1
1440p23-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 51 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 47 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 43 0−1
Fortnite 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 25 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 39 0−1
Fortnite 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 39 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 36 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75 0−1
Valorant 110−120 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.28 0.01
Recency 24 September 2024 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 3 nm 150 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 102700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 22 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 440 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook graphics card while GeForce4 MX 440 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440
GeForce4 MX 440

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 52 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 280 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or GeForce4 MX 440, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.