GeForce 9800 GX2 vs Arc Graphics 130V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130V with GeForce 9800 GX2, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 130V
2024
16 GB LPDDR5x
10.76
+637%

Graphics 130V outperforms 9800 GX2 by a whopping 637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4691034
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
Power efficiencyno data0.57
ArchitectureXe² (2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameLunar Lake iGPUG92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 September 2024 (1 year ago)18 March 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7256 (128 per GPU) ×2
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Boost clock speed1850 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data754 million
Manufacturing process technology3 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data197 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data38.40 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data16 ×2
TMUsno data64 ×2
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data2-slot
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR5xGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB512 MB ×2
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128 (64 per GPU) ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataHDMIDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130V 10.76
+637%
9800 GX2 1.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130V 4494
+634%
Samples: 994
9800 GX2 612
Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
+750%
4−5
−750%
1440p23
+667%
3−4
−667%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data149.75
1440pno data199.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 51
+750%
6−7
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+683%
6−7
−683%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 43
+760%
5−6
−760%
Fortnite 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+683%
6−7
−683%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Valorant 100−105
+733%
12−14
−733%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+662%
21−24
−662%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 39
+680%
5−6
−680%
Fortnite 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+683%
6−7
−683%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+700%
5−6
−700%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Valorant 100−105
+733%
12−14
−733%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+700%
6−7
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 36
+800%
4−5
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+683%
6−7
−683%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Valorant 100−105
+733%
12−14
−733%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+720%
10−11
−720%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+713%
8−9
−713%
Valorant 110−120
+644%
16−18
−644%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 55−60
+729%
7−8
−729%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%

This is how Arc Graphics 130V and 9800 GX2 compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130V is 750% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 130V is 667% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.76 1.46
Recency 24 September 2024 18 March 2008
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 3 nm 65 nm

Arc Graphics 130V has a 637% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2067% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Graphics 130V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GX2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 130V is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9800 GX2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 69 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130V or GeForce 9800 GX2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.