UHD Graphics vs Arc Graphics 130T

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130T
2025
15.59
+189%

Arc Graphics 130T outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking367641
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Power efficiencyno data38.15
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameno dataJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7256
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 130T 15.59
+189%
UHD Graphics 5.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 130T 6224
+189%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Fortnite 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+194%
16−18
−194%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
Valorant 120−130
+210%
40−45
−210%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+209%
65−70
−209%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Fortnite 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+194%
16−18
−194%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Valorant 120−130
+210%
40−45
−210%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+210%
21−24
−210%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+220%
10−11
−220%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+200%
21−24
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+211%
18−20
−211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+215%
27−30
−215%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+220%
35−40
−220%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Valorant 150−160
+210%
50−55
−210%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+207%
14−16
−207%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+230%
10−11
−230%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+208%
12−14
−208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+211%
9−10
−211%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Valorant 80−85
+211%
27−30
−211%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.59 5.39
Recency 6 January 2025 11 January 2021

Arc Graphics 130T has a 189.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Arc Graphics 130T is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7892 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.