Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Arc Graphics 130T
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Arc Graphics 130T outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 363 | 514 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 22.76 |
| Architecture | Xe+ (2025) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | no data | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 45−50
+66.7%
| 27
−66.7%
|
| 1440p | 24−27
+60%
| 15
−60%
|
| 4K | 21−24
+75%
| 12
−75%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+95.6%
|
45−50
−95.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+73.7%
|
19
−73.7%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 60−65
+107%
|
29
−107%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+63.4%
|
41
−63.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+95.6%
|
45−50
−95.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+106%
|
16
−106%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 60−65
+161%
|
23
−161%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+96.2%
|
26
−96.2%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+190%
|
30
−190%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+71.1%
|
35−40
−71.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+40%
|
35
−40%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+83.9%
|
30−35
−83.9%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+1.6%
|
124
−1.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+91.4%
|
35
−91.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85−90
+95.6%
|
45−50
−95.6%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 200−210
+114%
|
96
−114%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+154%
|
13
−154%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 60−65
+233%
|
18
−233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+104%
|
25
−104%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+314%
|
21
−314%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+71.1%
|
35−40
−71.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+58.1%
|
31
−58.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+247%
|
17
−247%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+113%
|
15
−113%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+83.9%
|
30−35
−83.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+40%
|
30
−40%
|
| Valorant | 120−130
+12.5%
|
112
−12.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+123%
|
30
−123%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
+200%
|
11
−200%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 60−65
+275%
|
16
−275%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+122%
|
23
−122%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+71.1%
|
35−40
−71.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 55−60
+83.9%
|
30−35
−83.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+200%
|
14
−200%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 85−90
+480%
|
15
−480%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+107%
|
14−16
−107%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
+74.2%
|
65−70
−74.2%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+257%
|
7
−257%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
+61.2%
|
95−100
−61.2%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+120%
|
20−22
−120%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+100%
|
7
−100%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 27−30
+80%
|
14−16
−80%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+113%
|
16
−113%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+81%
|
21−24
−81%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+100%
|
12−14
−100%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 35−40
+94.4%
|
18−20
−94.4%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+250%
|
8
−250%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+200%
|
4−5
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+83.3%
|
12
−83.3%
|
| Valorant | 85−90
+91.1%
|
45−50
−91.1%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+130%
|
10−11
−130%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 16−18
+60%
|
10−11
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+92.9%
|
14−16
−92.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 51
+0%
|
51
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 47
+0%
|
47
+0%
|
| Valorant | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dead Island 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
This is how Arc Graphics 130T and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is 67% faster in 1080p
- Arc Graphics 130T is 60% faster in 1440p
- Arc Graphics 130T is 75% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 59 tests (89%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
