Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Arc Graphics 130T

Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 130T and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc Graphics 130T
2025
15.59
+75.2%

Arc Graphics 130T outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking364509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.50
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores796
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++
Resizable BAR+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+66.7%
27
−66.7%
1440p24−27
+60%
15
−60%
4K21−24
+75%
12
−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+72.2%
18
−72.2%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+68.4%
19
−68.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+121%
14
−121%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+58.5%
41
−58.5%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+100%
16
−100%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+96.2%
26
−96.2%
Fortnite 85−90
+183%
30
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+65.8%
35−40
−65.8%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+37.1%
35
−37.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+80.6%
30−35
−80.6%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
124
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+138%
13
−138%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+85.7%
35
−85.7%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+109%
96
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+146%
13
−146%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+104%
25
−104%
Fortnite 85−90
+305%
21
−305%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+65.8%
35−40
−65.8%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+54.8%
31
−54.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+235%
17
−235%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+113%
15
−113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+80.6%
30−35
−80.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+36.7%
30
−36.7%
Valorant 120−130
+10.7%
112
−10.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 30−35
+158%
12
−158%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+117%
30
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+191%
11
−191%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+122%
23
−122%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+65.8%
35−40
−65.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+80.6%
30−35
−80.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+193%
14
−193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+467%
15
−467%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+100%
14−16
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+69.7%
65−70
−69.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+243%
7
−243%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Valorant 150−160
+58.2%
95−100
−58.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+115%
20−22
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+113%
16
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%

4K
High Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+250%
8
−250%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+75%
12
−75%
Valorant 80−85
+86.7%
45−50
−86.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Baldur's Gate 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 51
+0%
51
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Valorant 23
+0%
23
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 130T and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is 67% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 130T is 60% faster in 1440p
  • Arc Graphics 130T is 75% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Arc Graphics 130T is 467% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 130T is ahead in 59 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.59 8.90
Recency 6 January 2025 15 August 2020

Arc Graphics 130T has a 75.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 years.

The Arc Graphics 130T is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Arc Graphics 130T
Arc Graphics 130T
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
vs
HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
Arc Graphics 130T Arc Graphics 130T
vs
Radeon 860M Radeon 860M
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 4500 Blackwell
vs
R7 M350 2GB M350 2GB
GTX 1050 Ti NVIDIA GTX 1050 Ti
vs
Radeon 8050S 8050S
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Graphics 130T
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Graphics 130T
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Intel Xe Graphics G7
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Graphics 130T
Iris Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile Intel Xe Max (DG1 LP / iDG1LP) Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 130T Graphics 130T
R6 (Carrizo) AMD R6 (Carrizo)
vs
GT 720A 720A
Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop Nvidia PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
vs
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop Nvidia PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 1070 SLI Mobile
Nvidia RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop Nvidia PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile 1080 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1053 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 130T or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.