Radeon 880M vs Arc A770M

Place in the ranking	183	275
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	17.74	92.84
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	DG2-512	Strix Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2022 (3 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	512
Core clock speed	1650 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	524.8	92.80
Floating-point processing power	16.79 TFLOPS	2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	128	16
TMUs	256	32
Tensor Cores	512	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	32	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 30.92
+52.8%

Radeon 880M 20.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11888
+52.8%

Radeon 880M 7778

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770M 37375
+169%

Radeon 880M 13892

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770M 25563
+205%

Radeon 880M 8371

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770M 124487
+141%

Radeon 880M 51662

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A770M 10783
+259%

Radeon 880M 3006

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	94 +161%	36 −161%
1440p	57 +159%	22 −159%
4K	39 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +42.9%	42 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	113 +61.4%	70−75 −61.4%
Elden Ring	62 −3.2%	60−65 +3.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +40.6%	60−65 −40.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +81.8%	33 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 +60%	30−33 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	256 +246%	74 −246%
Metro Exodus	100 +85.2%	50−55 −85.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +39.1%	45−50 −39.1%
Valorant	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +40.6%	60−65 −40.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +140%	25 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Dota 2	58 +9.4%	53 −9.4%
Elden Ring	100−110 +64.1%	60−65 −64.1%
Far Cry 5	56 +27.3%	44 −27.3%
Fortnite	140−150 +36.4%	100−110 −36.4%
Forza Horizon 4	211 +235%	63 −235%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 +65.4%	52 −65.4%
Metro Exodus	82 +51.9%	50−55 −51.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +32.6%	130−140 −32.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +39.1%	45−50 −39.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +62.5%	60−65 −62.5%
Valorant	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%
World of Tanks	270−280 +18%	230−240 −18%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +40.6%	60−65 −40.6%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +186%	21 −186%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Dota 2	100−110 +56.9%	65−70 −56.9%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +28.4%	65−70 −28.4%
Forza Horizon 4	179 +238%	53 −238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +32.6%	130−140 −32.6%
Valorant	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 +145%	22 −145%
Elden Ring	55−60 +70.6%	30−35 −70.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +71.9%	30−35 −71.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +59.1%	110−120 −59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
World of Tanks	200−210 +46%	130−140 −46%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +46.3%	40−45 −46.3%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +47.4%	19 −47.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 +57.1%	14−16 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +74.5%	55−60 −74.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +63.5%	50−55 −63.5%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +50%	45−50 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +75%	27−30 −75%
Valorant	85−90 +71.2%	50−55 −71.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Dota 2	45 +32.4%	30−35 −32.4%
Elden Ring	27−30 +80%	14−16 −80%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 +32.4%	30−35 −32.4%
Metro Exodus	37 +147%	14−16 −147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +59%	60−65 −59%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 +32.4%	30−35 −32.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +70%	20−22 −70%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Dota 2	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +65.4%	24−27 −65.4%
Fortnite	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Forza Horizon 4	74 +147%	30−33 −147%
Valorant	45−50 +87.5%	24−27 −87.5%

This is how Arc A770M and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

Arc A770M is 161% faster in 1080p
Arc A770M is 159% faster in 1440p
Arc A770M is 63% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A770M is 246% faster.
in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 880M is 3% faster.

All in all, in popular games: