RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs Arc A770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770M with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

Arc A770M
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
30.12

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms Arc A770M by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20922
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.81
Power efficiency17.898.48
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-512GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409624064
Core clock speed1650 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate524.81,968
Floating-point processing power16.79 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs128192
TMUs256752
Tensor Cores512752
Ray Tracing Cores32188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount16 GB96 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A770M 30.12
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+137%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11983
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+137%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
−135%
200−210
+135%
1440p54
−122%
120−130
+122%
4K37
−130%
85−90
+130%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data42.83
1440pno data71.38
4Kno data100.76

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−110%
350−400
+110%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
−130%
260−270
+130%
Dead Island 2 120−130
−136%
300−310
+136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−136%
260−270
+136%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−110%
350−400
+110%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
−132%
220−230
+132%
Dead Island 2 120−130
−136%
300−310
+136%
Far Cry 5 106
−136%
250−260
+136%
Fortnite 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
270−280
+137%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−131%
210−220
+131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−133%
270−280
+133%
Valorant 180−190
−114%
400−450
+114%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−136%
260−270
+136%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−110%
350−400
+110%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−120%
600−650
+120%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
−134%
180−190
+134%
Dead Island 2 120−130
−136%
300−310
+136%
Dota 2 130−140
−127%
300−310
+127%
Far Cry 5 99
−132%
230−240
+132%
Fortnite 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
270−280
+137%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−131%
210−220
+131%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
−133%
200−210
+133%
Metro Exodus 93
−137%
220−230
+137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−133%
270−280
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
−131%
400−450
+131%
Valorant 180−190
−114%
400−450
+114%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−136%
260−270
+136%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
−124%
150−160
+124%
Dead Island 2 120−130
−136%
300−310
+136%
Dota 2 130−140
−127%
300−310
+127%
Far Cry 5 95
−132%
220−230
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−137%
270−280
+137%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−133%
270−280
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−135%
120−130
+135%
Valorant 180−190
−114%
400−450
+114%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−122%
300−310
+122%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 79
−128%
180−190
+128%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−122%
450−500
+122%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−136%
130−140
+136%
Metro Exodus 57
−128%
130−140
+128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−129%
400−450
+129%
Valorant 220−230
−122%
500−550
+122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−128%
180−190
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
−127%
100−105
+127%
Dead Island 2 55−60
−132%
130−140
+132%
Far Cry 5 81
−135%
190−200
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−131%
180−190
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−135%
120−130
+135%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−136%
170−180
+136%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−122%
100−105
+122%
Metro Exodus 37
−130%
85−90
+130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−126%
140−150
+126%
Valorant 170−180
−130%
400−450
+130%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−122%
100−105
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−126%
70−75
+126%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−127%
50−55
+127%
Dead Island 2 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Dota 2 90−95
−131%
210−220
+131%
Far Cry 5 45
−122%
100−105
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−131%
120−130
+131%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−127%
75−80
+127%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%

This is how Arc A770M and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 135% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 122% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 130% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.12 71.35
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 600 Watt

Arc A770M has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 136.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770M is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 93 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A770M or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.