Radeon RX 6300 vs Arc A770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 and Radeon RX 6300, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A770
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
34.21
+133%

Arc A770 outperforms RX 6300 by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking152358
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.00no data
Power efficiency10.4931.66
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096768
Core clock speed2100 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate614.497.92
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs25648
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.02x HDMI 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770 34.21
+133%
RX 6300 14.70

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770 13150
+133%
RX 6300 5648

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
+149%
45−50
−149%
1440p64
+137%
27−30
−137%
4K41
+156%
16−18
−156%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.94no data
1440p5.14no data
4K8.02no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 116
+158%
45−50
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+148%
40−45
−148%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 304
+134%
130−140
−134%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
Metro Exodus 120
+140%
50−55
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Valorant 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+151%
35−40
−151%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Dota 2 105
+133%
45−50
−133%
Far Cry 5 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Fortnite 150−160
+140%
65−70
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+135%
110−120
−135%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+133%
45−50
−133%
Metro Exodus 99
+148%
40−45
−148%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+136%
80−85
−136%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+136%
50−55
−136%
Valorant 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%
World of Tanks 270−280
+153%
110−120
−153%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+137%
35−40
−137%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+140%
30−33
−140%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+160%
35−40
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 216
+140%
90−95
−140%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+151%
35−40
−151%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+136%
80−85
−136%
Valorant 130−140
+147%
55−60
−147%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+133%
75−80
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
World of Tanks 210−220
+143%
90−95
−143%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+146%
24−27
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+142%
45−50
−142%
Forza Horizon 4 158
+143%
65−70
−143%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Metro Exodus 91
+160%
35−40
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+150%
24−27
−150%
Valorant 100−110
+155%
40−45
−155%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+133%
12−14
−133%
Dota 2 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Metro Exodus 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+167%
18−20
−167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+133%
21−24
−133%
Fortnite 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+154%
35−40
−154%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Valorant 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%

This is how Arc A770 and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 149% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 137% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 156% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.21 14.70
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 32 Watt

Arc A770 has a 132.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300, on the other hand, has 603.1% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5356 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.