Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Arc A770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Arc A770
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
31.69

AI PRO R9700 outperforms Arc A770 by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.50no data
Power efficiency10.7418.10
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-512Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Core clock speed2100 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate614.4747.5
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs128128
TMUs256256
Tensor Cores512128
Ray Tracing Cores3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.01x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A770 31.69
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+125%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770 13277
AI PRO R9700 29830
+125%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
−124%
240−250
+124%
1440p63
−122%
140−150
+122%
4K39
−118%
85−90
+118%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.07no data
1440p5.22no data
4K8.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 317
−121%
700−750
+121%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−118%
170−180
+118%
Hogwarts Legacy 125
−124%
280−290
+124%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−122%
260−270
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 270
−122%
600−650
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
−114%
150−160
+114%
Far Cry 5 117
−122%
260−270
+122%
Fortnite 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 33
−112%
70−75
+112%
Forza Horizon 5 139
−116%
300−310
+116%
Hogwarts Legacy 92
−117%
200−210
+117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−117%
280−290
+117%
Valorant 190−200
−101%
400−450
+101%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−122%
260−270
+122%
Counter-Strike 2 143
−110%
300−310
+110%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−117%
600−650
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−113%
130−140
+113%
Far Cry 5 109
−120%
240−250
+120%
Fortnite 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%
Forza Horizon 4 31
−110%
65−70
+110%
Forza Horizon 5 127
−120%
280−290
+120%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
−119%
230−240
+119%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
−116%
160−170
+116%
Metro Exodus 113
−121%
250−260
+121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−117%
280−290
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
−104%
400−450
+104%
Valorant 190−200
−101%
400−450
+101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
−122%
260−270
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
−124%
130−140
+124%
Far Cry 5 104
−121%
230−240
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−117%
50−55
+117%
Hogwarts Legacy 62
−110%
130−140
+110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−117%
280−290
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−122%
160−170
+122%
Valorant 190−200
−101%
400−450
+101%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
−107%
300−310
+107%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90
−122%
200−210
+122%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
−123%
500−550
+123%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−122%
100−105
+122%
Metro Exodus 71
−111%
150−160
+111%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−100%
350−400
+100%
Valorant 230−240
−113%
500−550
+113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−124%
190−200
+124%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
−122%
100−105
+122%
Far Cry 5 82
−120%
180−190
+120%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−100%
30−33
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 47
−113%
100−105
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−117%
130−140
+117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
−120%
180−190
+120%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
−114%
60−65
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
−108%
100−105
+108%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−100%
40−45
+100%
Metro Exodus 47
−113%
100−105
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
−119%
160−170
+119%
Valorant 190−200
−105%
400−450
+105%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−120%
110−120
+120%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−114%
75−80
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−112%
55−60
+112%
Far Cry 5 49
−124%
110−120
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 8
−100%
16−18
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
−122%
60−65
+122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−118%
85−90
+118%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
−118%
85−90
+118%

This is how Arc A770 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 124% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 122% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 118% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.69 71.19
Recency 12 October 2022 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 300 Watt

Arc A770 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 124.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5458 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A770 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.