Radeon 610M vs Arc A770

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770 with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.

Arc A770
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
33.47
+1091%

Arc A770 outperforms 610M by a whopping 1091% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155797
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.61no data
Power efficiency10.4513.16
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Dragon Range
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096128
Core clock speed2100 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate614.417.60
Floating-point processing power19.66 TFLOPS0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs1284
TMUs2568
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A770 33.47
+1091%
Radeon 610M 2.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770 13172
+1090%
Radeon 610M 1107

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770 41303
+1343%
Radeon 610M 2863

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A770 103295
+756%
Radeon 610M 12065

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770 32666
+1562%
Radeon 610M 1965

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770 139166
+901%
Radeon 610M 13898

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770 628292
+282%
Radeon 610M 164666

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111
+754%
13
−754%
1440p62
+1.6%
61
−1.6%
4K40
+1233%
3−4
−1233%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.96no data
1440p5.31no data
4K8.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 179
+2457%
7−8
−2457%
Counter-Strike 2 116
+1189%
9−10
−1189%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+1200%
6−7
−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 132
+1786%
7−8
−1786%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+1200%
9−10
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 99
+1000%
9−10
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+1067%
6−7
−1067%
Far Cry 5 117
+736%
14
−736%
Fortnite 140−150
+929%
14−16
−929%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+154%
12−14
−154%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+3375%
4−5
−3375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+877%
12−14
−877%
Valorant 190−200
+340%
45−50
−340%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 99
+1314%
7−8
−1314%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+1200%
9−10
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+878%
9−10
−878%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+431%
50−55
−431%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+917%
6−7
−917%
Far Cry 5 109
+738%
13
−738%
Fortnite 140−150
+929%
14−16
−929%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+138%
12−14
−138%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+3075%
4−5
−3075%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+556%
16
−556%
Metro Exodus 113
+1156%
9
−1156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+877%
12−14
−877%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+1300%
14
−1300%
Valorant 190−200
+340%
45−50
−340%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+1200%
9−10
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+822%
9−10
−822%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+867%
6−7
−867%
Far Cry 5 104
+767%
12
−767%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+877%
12−14
−877%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+800%
8
−800%
Valorant 190−200
+340%
45−50
−340%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+929%
14−16
−929%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+1000%
20−22
−1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Metro Exodus 71 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+775%
20−22
−775%
Valorant 230−240
+284%
61
−284%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+1114%
7−8
−1114%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Far Cry 5 82
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+1400%
4−5
−1400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+1520%
5−6
−1520%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Counter-Strike 2 10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+220%
14−16
−220%
Metro Exodus 47
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+1117%
6−7
−1117%
Valorant 190−200
+1271%
14−16
−1271%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
Counter-Strike 2 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Far Cry 5 49
+1533%
3−4
−1533%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

This is how Arc A770 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 754% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 1233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is ahead in 53 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.47 2.81
Recency 12 October 2022 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

Arc A770 has a 1091.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 610M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770 is a desktop card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 5380 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 848 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A770 or Radeon 610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.