RTX A1000 Mobile vs Arc A770

Place in performance ranking	193	220
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	11.19	no data
Architecture	Alchemist	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	DG2-512	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$329	no data
Current price	$597 (1.8x MSRP)	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2048
Core clock speed	2100 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	614.4	72.96

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Arc A770 and RTX A1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	Portable Device Dependent
HDMI	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770 25.79
+11.8%

RTX A1000 Mobile 23.06

Arc A770 outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A770 103295
+77.1%

RTX A1000 Mobile 58312

Arc A770 outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by 77% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A770 41303
+173%

RTX A1000 Mobile 15135

Arc A770 outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by 173% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A770 32666
+189%

RTX A1000 Mobile 11321

Arc A770 outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by 189% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A770 139166
+96.3%

RTX A1000 Mobile 70880

Arc A770 outperforms RTX A1000 Mobile by 96% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 +67.6%	68 −67.6%
1440p	68 +152%	27 −152%
4K	42 +20%	35−40 −20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−45.2%

61
+45.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 +41.3%	45−50 −41.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 +84%	50 −84%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +9.2%	75−80 −9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −19%	50 +19%
Far Cry 5	117 +37.6%	85 −37.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	120 +96.7%	60−65 −96.7%
Forza Horizon 4	33 −136%	75−80 +136%
Hitman 3	75−80 −7.7%	84 +7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	126 +85.3%	68 −85.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +10.5%	35−40 −10.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	139 +178%	50−55 −178%
Watch Dogs: Legion	102 +64.5%	62 −64.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 +21.7%	45−50 −21.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +139%	33 −139%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +9.2%	75−80 −9.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +13.3%	60−65 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +13.5%	37 −13.5%
Far Cry 5	109 +38%	79 −38%
Far Cry New Dawn	114 +86.9%	60−65 −86.9%
Forza Horizon 4	31 −152%	75−80 +152%
Hitman 3	75−80 +13%	69 −13%
Horizon Zero Dawn	109 +106%	53 −106%
Metro Exodus	113 +176%	41 −176%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +10.5%	35−40 −10.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	123 +146%	50−55 −146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	196 +131%	85 −131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	93 +72.2%	54 −72.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −2.2%	45−50 +2.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +188%	25 −188%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +9.2%	75−80 −9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +44.8%	29 −44.8%
Far Cry 5	104 +42.5%	73 −42.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	103 +68.9%	60−65 −68.9%
Forza Horizon 4	23 −239%	75−80 +239%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 +67.4%	43 −67.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 +185%	26 −185%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +14.3%	35−40 −14.3%
Hitman 3	40−45 +4.9%	41 −4.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	84 +121%	38 −121%
Metro Exodus	71 +196%	24 −196%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	86 +187%	30−33 −187%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +60%	24−27 −60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +173%	22 −173%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +11.8%	50−55 −11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Far Cry 5	82 +110%	35−40 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	91 +107%	40−45 −107%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −213%	45−50 +213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 +122%	27−30 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 +247%	17 −247%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Hitman 3	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24 +60%	14−16 −60%
Metro Exodus	47 +236%	14−16 −236%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	49 +206%	16−18 −206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 +192%	24−27 −192%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 +114%	14−16 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +217%	12−14 −217%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +14.8%	27−30 −14.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	49 +158%	18−20 −158%
Far Cry New Dawn	56 +155%	21−24 −155%
Forza Horizon 4	8 −313%	30−35 +313%
Watch Dogs: Legion	37 +270%	10−11 −270%

This is how Arc A770 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

Arc A770 is 67.6% faster than RTX A1000 Mobile in 1080p
Arc A770 is 152% faster than RTX A1000 Mobile in 1440p
Arc A770 is 20% faster than RTX A1000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770 is 270% faster than the RTX A1000 Mobile.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 313% faster than the Arc A770.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A770 is ahead in 59 tests (87%)
RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 9 tests (13%)

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	25.79	23.06
Recency	12 October 2022	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	95 Watt