UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile vs Arc A750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking175not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.14no data
Power efficiency9.55no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameDG2-512Tiger Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584128
Core clock speed2050 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate537.611.60
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS0.3712 TFLOPS
ROPs1124
TMUs2248
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

Arc A750 has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A750 and UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A750
Arc A750
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 793 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.