GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Arc A530M

Place in the ranking	309	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.90
Power efficiency	19.23	19.95
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-256	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 August 2023 (1 year ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	8448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	11,500 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	124.8	689.0
Floating-point processing power	3.994 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	96
TMUs	96	264
Tensor Cores	192	264
Ray Tracing Cores	12	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A530M 18.16

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.58
+355%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A530M 6979

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31738
+355%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −402%	226 +402%
1440p	30−35 −430%	159 +430%
4K	18−21 −428%	95 +428%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.54
1440p	no data	5.03
4K	no data	8.41

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −491%	189 +491%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −102%	110−120 +102%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −491%	189 +491%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −514%	467 +514%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −367%	220−230 +367%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −229%	160−170 +229%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −260%	150−160 +260%
Valorant	70−75 −577%	450−500 +577%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −102%	110−120 +102%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −434%	171 +434%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Dota 2	65−70 −168%	174 +168%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −138%	150 +138%
Fortnite	95−100 −214%	300−350 +214%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −482%	442 +482%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −367%	220−230 +367%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −172%	174 +172%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −61.2%	79 +61.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −72%	210−220 +72%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −260%	150−160 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −211%	170−180 +211%
Valorant	70−75 −577%	450−500 +577%
World of Tanks	210−220 −27.4%	270−280 +27.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −102%	110−120 +102%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −369%	150 +369%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −344%	160−170 +344%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −149%	150−160 +149%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −436%	407 +436%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −367%	220−230 +367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −72%	210−220 +72%
Valorant	70−75 −577%	450−500 +577%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30 −454%	155 +454%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −434%	155 +434%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 −6.1%	170−180 +6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −481%	90−95 +481%
World of Tanks	120−130 −313%	500−550 +313%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −135%	85−90 +135%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −240%	160−170 +240%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −565%	306 +565%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 −490%	170−180 +490%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −246%	140−150 +246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −536%	159 +536%
Valorant	45−50 −785%	400−450 +785%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −324%	72 +324%
Dota 2	30−35 −487%	182 +487%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −487%	182 +487%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −546%	84 +546%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −287%	200−210 +287%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −433%	60−65 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −487%	182 +487%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −406%	90−95 +406%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −29.4%	22 +29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −357%	100−110 +357%
Fortnite	21−24 −357%	95−100 +357%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −500%	162 +500%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −686%	110−120 +686%
Valorant	21−24 −1038%	230−240 +1038%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

This is how Arc A530M and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 402% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 430% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 428% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 1038% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 55 tests (98%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.16	82.58
Recency	1 August 2023	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	285 Watt

Arc A530M has 338.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 354.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A530M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.