Radeon PRO W7700 vs Arc A370M

Place in performance ranking	317	45
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	24.78
Architecture	Xe HPG (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Alchemist	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	no data	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	3072
Core clock speed	1550 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1550 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt (35 - 50 Watt TGP)	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.20	499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A370M and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 15.79

PRO W7700 51.83
+228%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Arc A370M by 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A370M 5115

PRO W7700 20016
+291%

Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms Arc A370M by 291% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	38 −216%	120−130 +216%
1440p	20 −225%	65−70 +225%
4K	40 −225%	130−140 +225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−229%

46
+229%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −230%	33 +230%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −264%	50−55 +264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −270%	37 +270%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −258%	40−45 +258%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −252%	70−75 +252%
Hitman 3	9−10 −244%	30−35 +244%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −250%	60−65 +250%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −231%	50−55 +231%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −252%	74 +252%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −275%	45 +275%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −233%	20 +233%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −264%	50−55 +264%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −257%	25 +257%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −258%	40−45 +258%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −252%	70−75 +252%
Hitman 3	9−10 −244%	30−35 +244%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −250%	60−65 +250%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −231%	50−55 +231%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −244%	62 +244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −231%	53 +231%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −257%	50−55 +257%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −260%	18 +260%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −270%	35−40 +270%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −252%	70−75 +252%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −250%	60−65 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −231%	53 +231%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −271%	26 +271%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −275%	15 +275%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−267%

40−45
+267%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −244%	30−35 +244%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −333%	13 +333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −263%	29 +263%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Hitman 3	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −256%	30−35 +256%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −250%	27−30 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −270%	37 +270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −267%	11 +267%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−271%

24−27

+271%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Hitman 3	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−250%

14−16

+250%

This is how Arc A370M and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

PRO W7700 is 216% faster in 1080p
PRO W7700 is 225% faster in 1440p
PRO W7700 is 225% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.79	51.83
Recency	30 March 2022	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	190 Watt