Radeon 740M vs Arc A370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
11.45
+59.2%

Arc A370M outperforms 740M by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking401522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.9438.00
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameDG2-128Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speed300 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate99.2040.00
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6416
Ray Tracing Cores84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc A370M 11.45
+59.2%
Radeon 740M 7.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
+59.2%
Radeon 740M 3212

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A370M 12090
+61.4%
Radeon 740M 7490

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A370M 8149
+58.7%
Radeon 740M 5135

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A370M 3885
+129%
Radeon 740M 1699

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD39
+85.7%
21
−85.7%
1440p20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
4K34
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−5.8%
73
+5.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+188%
16−18
−188%
Hogwarts Legacy 43
+95.5%
22
−95.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+58.8%
30−35
−58.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+15%
60
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+131%
16−18
−131%
Far Cry 5 49
+96%
24−27
−96%
Fortnite 70−75
+53.2%
45−50
−53.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 30
+76.5%
17
−76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%
Valorant 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+58.8%
30−35
−58.8%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+165%
26
−165%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+42.3%
120−130
−42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Dota 2 68
+70%
40−45
−70%
Far Cry 5 46
+84%
24−27
−84%
Fortnite 70−75
+53.2%
45−50
−53.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20
+53.8%
13
−53.8%
Metro Exodus 34
+127%
14−16
−127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+152%
21−24
−152%
Valorant 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+58.8%
30−35
−58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Dota 2 66
+65%
40−45
−65%
Far Cry 5 43
+72%
24−27
−72%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 13
+30%
10
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+60.7%
27−30
−60.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Valorant 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+53.2%
45−50
−53.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+55%
60−65
−55%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 20
+150%
8−9
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+146%
40−45
−146%
Valorant 130−140
+51.1%
85−90
−51.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+100%
16−18
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 29
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Valorant 65−70
+67.5%
40−45
−67.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 40
+66.7%
24−27
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+69.2%
12−14
−69.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

This is how Arc A370M and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A370M is 86% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A370M is 67% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A370M is 62% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc A370M is 188% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 740M is 6% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A370M is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.45 7.19
Recency 30 March 2022 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Arc A370M has a 59.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Arc A370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 178 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 121 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A370M or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.