Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs Arc A350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A350M with Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

Arc A350M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
12.92

RX 9060 XT 8 GB outperforms Arc A350M by a whopping 254% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking40790
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data79.57
Power efficiency39.3523.22
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameDG2-128Navi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (3 years ago)4 June 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed300 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate55.20400.6
Floating-point processing power1.766 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs48128
Ray Tracing Cores632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−233%
120−130
+233%
1440p16
−244%
55−60
+244%
4K9
−233%
30−35
+233%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.49
1440pno data5.44
4Kno data9.97

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−247%
260−270
+247%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−252%
95−100
+252%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−245%
200−210
+245%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−247%
260−270
+247%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−242%
65−70
+242%
Far Cry 5 42
−233%
140−150
+233%
Fortnite 75−80
−242%
260−270
+242%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−239%
190−200
+239%
Forza Horizon 5 50
−240%
170−180
+240%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
Valorant 110−120
−254%
400−450
+254%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−245%
200−210
+245%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−247%
260−270
+247%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−253%
650−700
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−244%
55−60
+244%
Dota 2 62
−239%
210−220
+239%
Far Cry 5 39
−233%
130−140
+233%
Fortnite 75−80
−242%
260−270
+242%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−239%
190−200
+239%
Forza Horizon 5 47
−240%
160−170
+240%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
−246%
90−95
+246%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−249%
150−160
+249%
Valorant 110−120
−254%
400−450
+254%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−245%
200−210
+245%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
Dota 2 59
−239%
200−210
+239%
Far Cry 5 37
−251%
130−140
+251%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−239%
190−200
+239%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−242%
65−70
+242%
Valorant 110−120
−254%
400−450
+254%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
−242%
260−270
+242%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−246%
90−95
+246%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−105
−250%
350−400
+250%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
−250%
35−40
+250%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−251%
400−450
+251%
Valorant 140−150
−219%
450−500
+219%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−218%
35−40
+218%
Far Cry 5 25
−240%
85−90
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−245%
100−105
+245%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−218%
35−40
+218%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−233%
50−55
+233%
Valorant 70−75
−247%
250−260
+247%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−220%
16−18
+220%
Dota 2 45−50
−233%
160−170
+233%
Far Cry 5 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−248%
80−85
+248%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%

This is how Arc A350M and RX 9060 XT 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 233% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 244% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 233% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.92 45.74
Recency 30 March 2022 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 150 Watt

Arc A350M has 500% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 254% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A350M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 58 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 50 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A350M or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.