Arc A350M vs Radeon RX 9060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9060 9060 XT 9060 XT 8 GB 9060 XT 16 GB 9060 XT 16GB 9070 9070 GRE 9070 XT
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 9060 with Arc A350M, including specs and performance data.

RX 9060
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 132 Watt
48.57
+268%

RX 9060 outperforms Arc A350M by a whopping 268% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 9060 RX 9060
Arc A350M Arc A350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71403
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.0340.22
ArchitectureRDNA 4.0 (2025)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 44DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 August 2025 (recently)30 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792768
Core clock speed1700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2990 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistors29,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)132 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate334.955.20
Floating-point processing power21.43 TFLOPS1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs11248
Ray Tracing Cores286

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2518 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth322.3 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+261%
36
−261%
1440p60−65
+253%
17
−253%
4K30−35
+233%
9
−233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
God of War 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Far Cry 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
God of War 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+0%
16
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
God of War 15
+0%
15
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+0%
26
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
God of War 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
God of War 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
God of War 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how RX 9060 and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 is 261% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9060 is 253% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9060 is 233% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 48.57 13.20
Recency 5 August 2025 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 132 Watt 25 Watt

RX 9060 has a 268% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A350M, on the other hand, has 428% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop graphics card while Arc A350M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 9060
Radeon RX 9060
Intel Arc A350M
Arc A350M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile A5500 Mobile
Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Arc A350M A350M
Arc A350M Arc A350M
vs
RX 7400 7400
Arc 3 A350M Intel 3 A350M
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell NVIDIA PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Arc 3 A350M A350M
Arc 3 A350M Intel 3 A350M
vs
RX 7400 7400
RX 9060 AMD RX 9060
vs
Arc 3 A350M A350M
Arc 3 A370M Intel 3 A370M
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 4000 Blackwell SFF

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 9060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 59 votes

Rate Arc A350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 9060 or Arc A350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.