Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Arc A350M

Place in performance ranking	342	34
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	41.26
Architecture	Xe HPG (2020−2022)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Alchemist	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449
Current price	no data	$443 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	3456
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.20	549.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A350M and Radeon RX 7700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.32

RX 7700 XT 57.64
+303%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A350M by 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A350M 10730

RX 7700 XT 57340
+434%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A350M by 434% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A350M 31023

RX 7700 XT 126733
+309%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A350M by 309% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A350M 7147

RX 7700 XT 42801
+499%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A350M by 499% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A350M 36315

RX 7700 XT 201871
+456%

Radeon RX 7700 XT outperforms Arc A350M by 456% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 −400%	180 +400%
1440p	18 −472%	103 +472%
4K	8 −638%	59 +638%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

45−50
−329%

193

+329%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −313%	165 +313%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −350%	180 +350%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −307%	180−190 +307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −351%	158 +351%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −363%	130−140 +363%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −328%	278 +328%
Hitman 3	27−30 −315%	110−120 +315%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −312%	391 +312%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −350%	130−140 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −333%	110−120 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −319%	398 +319%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −307%	120−130 +307%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −323%	148 +323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −326%	149 +326%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −307%	180−190 +307%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −340%	132 +340%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −363%	130−140 +363%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −324%	190−200 +324%
Hitman 3	27−30 −315%	110−120 +315%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −338%	240−250 +338%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −322%	76 +322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −333%	110−120 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −318%	334 +318%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −321%	295 +321%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −307%	120−130 +307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −303%	121 +303%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −340%	132 +340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −307%	122 +307%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −320%	231 +320%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −332%	216 +332%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −310%	287 +310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −320%	168 +320%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −307%	120−130 +307%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
−333%

110−120

+333%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −313%	120−130 +313%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −340%	130−140 +340%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −308%	98 +308%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −321%	101 +321%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −333%	90−95 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −344%	80 +344%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −349%	157 +349%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −338%	197 +338%
Hitman 3	18−20 −350%	80−85 +350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −328%	171 +328%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −347%	134 +347%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −329%	193 +329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −344%	120 +344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−308%

95−100
+308%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −306%	65−70 +306%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −350%	50−55 +350%
Hitman 3	12−14 −308%	45−50 +308%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −356%	80−85 +356%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −313%	66 +313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −324%	89 +324%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −314%	58 +314%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −321%	59 +321%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −310%	40−45 +310%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −350%	36 +350%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −322%	35−40 +322%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −347%	134 +347%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −329%	103 +329%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −324%	89 +324%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−307%

55−60
+307%

This is how Arc A350M and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7700 XT is 400% faster in 1080p
RX 7700 XT is 472% faster in 1440p
RX 7700 XT is 638% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.32	57.64
Recency	30 March 2022	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	245 Watt