RTX A1000 Embedded vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU and RTX A1000 Embedded, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
17.53

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking308190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data60.96
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUGA107S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Core clock speedno data630 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1140 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data72.96
Floating-point processing powerno data4.669 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
1440p16
−50%
24−27
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Far Cry 5 37
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−60.9%
140−150
+60.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Far Cry 5 35
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%
Hitman 3 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−60.9%
140−150
+60.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−61%
95−100
+61%
Far Cry 5 33
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−63.3%
80−85
+63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−52.2%
35−40
+52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−60.9%
140−150
+60.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Hitman 3 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−66.7%
60−65
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−61.6%
160−170
+61.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−65.1%
180−190
+65.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Hitman 3 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
−61.3%
150−160
+61.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and RTX A1000 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 63% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 50% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.53 29.47
Recency 14 December 2023 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 5 nm 8 nm

Arc 8-Cores iGPU has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 68.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 63 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 16 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.