Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.53
+86.2%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking302455
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896
Boost clock speed2300 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR4
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.53
+86.2%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.95

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561
+71.2%
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+100%
18−20
−100%
1440p19
+90%
10−12
−90%
4K15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26
+117%
12−14
−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+84.4%
30−35
−84.4%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+117%
12−14
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 71
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Metro Exodus 40
+90.5%
21−24
−90.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+65.4%
24−27
−65.4%
Valorant 75−80
+97.4%
35−40
−97.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+84.4%
30−35
−84.4%
Counter-Strike 2 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Dota 2 25
−44%
35−40
+44%
Far Cry 5 34
−20.6%
40−45
+20.6%
Fortnite 100−105
+72.4%
55−60
−72.4%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−44%
35−40
+44%
Metro Exodus 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+64.9%
75−80
−64.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+65.4%
24−27
−65.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+93.3%
30−33
−93.3%
Valorant 75−80
+97.4%
35−40
−97.4%
World of Tanks 220−230
+54.2%
140−150
−54.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+84.4%
30−35
−84.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+56.1%
40−45
−56.1%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+64.9%
75−80
−64.9%
Valorant 75−80
+87.5%
40−45
−87.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+96.5%
85−90
−96.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
World of Tanks 120−130
+95.4%
65−70
−95.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+123%
21−24
−123%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Valorant 45−50
+95.8%
24−27
−95.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Dota 2 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−122%
20−22
+122%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+104%
27−30
−104%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−122%
20−22
+122%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Fortnite 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Valorant 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 100% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 90% faster in 1440p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 88% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 160% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 122% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is ahead in 26 tests (58%)
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 6 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.53 9.95
Recency 14 December 2023 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 86.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 50 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.