Radeon R9 380 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with Radeon R9 380, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.71

R9 380 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.20
Power efficiencyno data5.77
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataAntigua
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)18 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81792
Compute unitsno data28
Core clock speed1278 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data970 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data108.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.476 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length / dual slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2 x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)no data-
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data970 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data182.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
Number of Eyefinity displaysno data6
HDMI-+
DisplayPort support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
LiquidVR-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
VCE-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-+
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 13.71
R9 380 15.89
+15.9%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200
R9 380 303773
+8.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−141%
65
+141%
4K21−24
−28.6%
27
+28.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.06
4Kno data7.37

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−14.8%
30−35
+14.8%
Elden Ring 40−45
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−13.3%
50−55
+13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−14.8%
30−35
+14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−11.8%
35−40
+11.8%
Valorant 50−55
−18.5%
60−65
+18.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−13.3%
50−55
+13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−14.8%
30−35
+14.8%
Dota 2 45−50
−16.3%
55−60
+16.3%
Elden Ring 40−45
−19.5%
45−50
+19.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−9.6%
55−60
+9.6%
Fortnite 75−80
−14.3%
85−90
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−16.3%
55−60
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−16.2%
40−45
+16.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−13%
110−120
+13%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−11.8%
35−40
+11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−23.8%
52
+23.8%
Valorant 50−55
−18.5%
60−65
+18.5%
World of Tanks 180−190
−11%
200−210
+11%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−13.3%
50−55
+13.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−14.8%
30−35
+14.8%
Dota 2 45−50
−16.3%
55−60
+16.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−9.6%
55−60
+9.6%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
−13%
110−120
+13%
Valorant 50−55
−18.5%
60−65
+18.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Elden Ring 21−24
−19%
24−27
+19%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−34.9%
140−150
+34.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
World of Tanks 95−100
−14.4%
110−120
+14.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−21.9%
35−40
+21.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−18.2%
35−40
+18.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Valorant 30−35
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Dota 2 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Elden Ring 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−17.5%
45−50
+17.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Fortnite 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Valorant 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and R9 380 compete in popular games:

  • R9 380 is 141% faster in 1080p
  • R9 380 is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 380 is 35% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 380 is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.71 15.89
Recency 10 November 2020 18 June 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

R9 380, on the other hand, has a 15.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon R9 380 is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while Radeon R9 380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 923 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 821 vote

Rate Radeon R9 380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.