Quadro T600 Mobile vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Apple M1 8-Core GPU with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
14.08

T600 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking347307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2021)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2020 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8896
Core clock speed1278 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data74.76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data10000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkanno data1.2
CUDAno data7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−96.2%
51
+96.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50
−17%
55−60
+17%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−14%
65−70
+14%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−8%
27−30
+8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−11.1%
60−65
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−11.1%
50−55
+11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Hitman 3 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−2.9%
35−40
+2.9%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−11.1%
30−33
+11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T600 Mobile is 96% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.08 16.48
Recency 10 November 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm

The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 891 vote

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.