GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Aggregated performance score
Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 344 | 362 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | no data | Pascal (2016−2021) |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 10 November 2020 (3 years ago) | April 2018 (6 years ago) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 1366 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1442 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 3 MB |
Memory bus width | no data | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1752 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 84 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Multi-Projection | no data | + |
Multi Monitor | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
Vulkan | no data | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 28
+16.7%
| 24−27
−16.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+27.8%
|
18−20
−27.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+20%
|
40−45
−20%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+26.7%
|
30−33
−26.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+11.1%
|
45−50
−11.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+26.7%
|
30−33
−26.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+23.8%
|
21−24
−23.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+27.8%
|
18−20
−27.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+20%
|
40−45
−20%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+26.7%
|
30−33
−26.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+11.1%
|
45−50
−11.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+26.7%
|
30−33
−26.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Metro Exodus | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
+14.3%
|
21−24
−14.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 32
+18.5%
|
27−30
−18.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+23.8%
|
21−24
−23.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+27.8%
|
18−20
−27.8%
|
Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+20%
|
40−45
−20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 35−40
+26.7%
|
30−33
−26.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+11.1%
|
45−50
−11.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27
+23.8%
|
21−24
−23.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
+22.2%
|
18−20
−22.2%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+20.8%
|
24−27
−20.8%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+27.8%
|
18−20
−27.8%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+19%
|
21−24
−19%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Battlefield 5 | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+16.7%
|
12−14
−16.7%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18
−18.8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:
- Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 16.7% faster than Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in 1080p
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 14.04 | 12.78 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.