Xclipse 950 GPU vs Rubin Ultra GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRubin Ultra (2027)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGR110Galileo
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date202725 July 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores573441024
Core clock speed700 MHz999 MHz
Boost clock speed2267 MHzno data
Number of transistors670,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology3 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)3600 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4,062.563.94
Floating-point processing power260 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2464
TMUs179264
Tensor Cores1792no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache112 MB512 KB
L2 Cache128 MB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 6.0 x16IGP
WidthSXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM4eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1024 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32768 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth31.1 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader ModelN/AN/A
OpenGLN/AES 3.2
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA10.7-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 3600 Watt 15 Watt

Xclipse 950 GPU has 23900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Rubin Ultra GPU and Xclipse 950 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation graphics card while Xclipse 950 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 950 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rubin Ultra GPU or Xclipse 950 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.