Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) vs 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
820M 840M 860M 880M 890M 8065S RX 8040S RX 8060S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2 3 5 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 9

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8065S and Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8065S
2026
55 Watt
44.23
+679%

8065S outperforms 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by a whopping 679% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking98659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency62.2129.29
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGorgon HaloVega Renoir
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2026 (recently)7 January 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1295 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed3000 MHz1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate480.0no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.4-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150−160
+650%
20
−650%
1440p180−190
+650%
24
−650%
4K140−150
+678%
18
−678%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+362%
52
−362%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+715%
13
−715%
Palworld 120−130
+771%
14−16
−771%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130
+786%
14
−786%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+550%
22
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+606%
34
−606%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+960%
10
−960%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+840%
15
−840%
Fortnite 190−200
+479%
33
−479%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+558%
24−27
−558%
Palworld 120−130
+771%
14−16
−771%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+695%
21−24
−695%
Valorant 250−260
+159%
97
−159%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+581%
21
−581%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+1614%
14
−1614%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+396%
56
−396%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1414%
7
−1414%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+781%
16
−781%
Fortnite 190−200
+768%
22
−768%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+558%
24−27
−558%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+847%
15
−847%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+1263%
8
−1263%
Palworld 120−130
+771%
14−16
−771%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+695%
21−24
−695%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+956%
16
−956%
Valorant 250−260
+244%
73
−244%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+653%
19
−653%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1225%
8
−1225%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+781%
16
−781%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+558%
24−27
−558%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+695%
21−24
−695%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+1436%
11
−1436%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 190−200
+446%
35−40
−446%
Palworld 120−130
+771%
14−16
−771%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+982%
10−12
−982%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+618%
40−45
−618%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+1800%
5−6
−1800%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+1240%
5−6
−1240%
Valorant 280−290
+482%
49
−482%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+1288%
8−9
−1288%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+900%
10−12
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+915%
12−14
−915%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+1038%
8−9
−1038%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+1000%
10−12
−1000%
Palworld 70−75
+775%
8−9
−775%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+800%
6−7
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+500%
16−18
−500%
Metro Exodus 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+2367%
3−4
−2367%
Valorant 270−280
+1136%
22
−1136%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+1700%
4−5
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+1140%
5−6
−1140%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+1013%
8−9
−1013%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+1000%
6−7
−1000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+917%
6−7
−917%
Palworld 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 42
+0%
42
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Valorant 19
+0%
19
+0%

1440p
High

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 19
+0%
19
+0%

This is how Radeon 8065S and RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S is 650% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 8065S is 650% faster in 1440p
  • Radeon 8065S is 678% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Palworld, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 4000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S performs better in 56 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 44.23 5.68
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 8065S has a 679% higher aggregate performance score, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), on the other hand, has 267% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 8065S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
GeForce MX250 GeForce MX250
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU Apple Max 32-Core GPU
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Apple M4 9-Core GPU Apple 9 Core GPU
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Apple M4 9-Core GPU Apple 9 Core GPU
vs
Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU 20-Core GPU
Apple M4 9-Core GPU Apple 9 Core GPU
vs
Arc Graphics 140T 140T
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
Vega 7 7
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 980M SLI GeForce GTX 980M SLI
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile NVIDIA 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 2070 Super 2070 Super
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile NVIDIA 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
RTX 2050 Max-Q 2050 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 873 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.