Rubin Ultra GPU vs AeroBox GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameKryptosGR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2020 (6 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89657344
Core clock speed935 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistorsno data670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate55.164,062.5
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs561792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 3600 Watt

AeroBox GPU has 3500% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 433% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 680 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about AeroBox GPU or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.