Rubin Ultra GPU vs Iris Plus Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2GR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 May 2020 (6 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51257344
Core clock speed300 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistorsno data670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate33.604,062.5
Floating-point processing power1.075 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs321792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cacheno data112 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM4e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1024 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32768 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data31.1 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.97N/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 3600 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G7 has 23900% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Iris Plus Graphics G7 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Iris Plus Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 79 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Plus Graphics G7 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.