Xeon X7460 vs X5687

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1469	1533
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.22	1.48
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	no data
Release date	14 February 2011 (13 years ago)	1 July 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$121	no data
Current price	$230 (1.9x MSRP)	$154

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X7460 has 21% better value for money than Xeon X5687.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	8	no data
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.86 GHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	12 MB (shared)	16 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm
Die size	239 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	80 °C	64 °C
Number of transistors	1,170 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.9V-1.45V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	no data
Socket	FCLGA1366,LGA1366	PGA604
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	-
Thermal Monitoring	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	+
PAE	40 Bit	no data
FSB parity	no data	+
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	288 GB	no data
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

X5687 outperforms X7460 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.43	3.11
Recency	14 February 2011	1 July 2008
Chip lithography	32 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Xeon X7460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---