Core i3-10100F vs Xeon X5687

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.43
Core i3-10100F
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.67
+65.3%

i3-10100F outperforms Xeon X5687 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14781073
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0749.15
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)12 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121$122
Current price$267 (2.2x MSRP)$65 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-10100F has 4493% better value for money than Xeon X5687.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)6 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPPno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size288 GB128 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s41.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5687 3.43
i3-10100F 5.67
+65.3%

Core i3-10100F outperforms Xeon X5687 by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5687 5309
i3-10100F 8766
+65.1%

Core i3-10100F outperforms Xeon X5687 by 65% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 5.67
Recency 14 February 2011 12 October 2020
Cost $121 $122
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i3-10100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5687 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5687 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-10100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Core i3-10100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
Intel Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 52 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7048 votes

Rate Core i3-10100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Core i3-10100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.