Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Xeon X5687

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5687
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.43
+318%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.82

Xeon X5687 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking14792490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date14 February 2011 (13 years ago)26 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$121$80
Current price$267 (2.2x MSRP)$27 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.86 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5687 3.43
+318%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.82

Xeon X5687 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5687 5309
+316%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275

Xeon X5687 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by 316% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 0.82
Recency 14 February 2011 26 September 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Cost $121 $80
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon X5687 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5687 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5687 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5687
Xeon X5687
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 52 votes

Rate Xeon X5687 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 98 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5687 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.