Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Xeon X5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5650
2010, $53
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.26
+353%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010, $80
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.72

Xeon X5650 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 353% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17552907
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency3.68no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date16 March 2010 (15 years ago)26 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt1 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5650 3.26
+353%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X5650 5749
+351%
Samples: 787
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
Samples: 241

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.26 0.72
Recency 16 March 2010 26 September 2010
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 1 Watt

Xeon X5650 has a 352.8% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 9400% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon X5650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5650 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 489 votes

Rate Xeon X5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 112 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5650 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.