Xeon Platinum 8380 vs X5650

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5650
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.73
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021
40 cores / 80 threads, 270 Watt
40.72
+992%

Xeon Platinum 8380 outperforms Xeon X5650 by a whopping 992% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking150070
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.5813.75
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)40 (Tetraconta-Core)
Threads1280
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size288 GB6 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5650 3.73
Xeon Platinum 8380 40.72
+992%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5650 5710
Xeon Platinum 8380 62318
+991%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.73 40.72
Recency 16 March 2010 6 April 2021
Physical cores 6 40
Threads 12 80
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 270 Watt

Xeon X5650 has 184.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8380, on the other hand, has a 991.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 566.7% more physical cores and 566.7% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5650 and Xeon Platinum 8380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 452 votes

Rate Xeon X5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 83 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5650 or Xeon Platinum 8380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.