Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Xeon X5450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5450
2007
120 Watt
1.51
+403%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30

Xeon X5450 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by a whopping 403% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21483111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.192.84
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA771BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5450 1.51
+403%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5450 2406
+399%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 0.30
Recency 1 October 2007 1 September 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X5450 has a 403.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 1100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5450 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5450 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5450
Xeon X5450
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 321 vote

Rate Xeon X5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5450 or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.