Athlon X2 7750 BE vs Xeon X5355
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2275 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 1.01 | no data |
Architecture codename | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Kuma (2008−2009) |
Release date | 14 November 2006 (17 years ago) | December 2008 (15 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,172 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.67 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB (per die) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 63 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 582 million | 450 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 1V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
Socket | LGA771,PLGA771 | AM2+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon X5355 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Athlon X2 7750 BE, on the other hand, has 26.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X5355 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon X2 7750 BE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5355 and Athlon X2 7750 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.