Apple M1 vs Ryzen 9 7940HX
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 9 7940HX outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 560% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 9 7940HX and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 124 | 1250 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 58.55 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | no data |
| Release date | 17 January 2024 (1 year ago) | 10 November 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 9 7940HX and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.064 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | 64 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9900 Million | 16000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 9 7940HX and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FL1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 9 7940HX and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Radeon 610M | AMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz) | Apple M1 8-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.81 | 5.12 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.49 | 11.81 |
| Recency | 17 January 2024 | 10 November 2020 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 8 |
Ryzen 9 7940HX has a 560.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Apple M1, on the other hand, has 374.3% faster integrated GPU.
The Ryzen 9 7940HX is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
