FX-4150 vs Xeon X3480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.04
FX-4150
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.07
+1.5%

FX-4150 outperforms Xeon X3480 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3480 and FX-4150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19581940
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.052.08
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3480 and FX-4150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3480 and FX-4150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3480 and FX-4150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4150 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4150.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X3480 2.04
FX-4150 2.07
+1.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3480 3273
FX-4150 3327
+1.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 2.07
Recency 30 May 2010 23 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

Xeon X3480 has 100% more threads.

FX-4150, on the other hand, has a 1.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3480 and FX-4150.

Be aware that Xeon X3480 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4150 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480
AMD FX-4150
FX-4150

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 148 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 23 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X3480 and FX-4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.