FX-4100 vs Xeon X3480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.14
+25.1%

Xeon X3480 outperforms FX-4100 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3480 and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18862065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.051.64
Architecture codenameno dataZambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)12 October 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3480 and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.73 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache8192 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3480 and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3480 and FX-4100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3480 and FX-4100.

PCIe version2.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3480 2.14
+25.1%
FX-4100 1.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3480 3273
+25.1%
FX-4100 2617

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 1.71
Recency 1 April 2010 12 October 2011
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

Xeon X3480 has a 25.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

FX-4100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon X3480 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3480 is a server/workstation processor while FX-4100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3480 and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 883 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3480 or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.