FX-9830P vs Xeon X3470

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads
2.11

FX-9830P outperforms Xeon X3470 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17731760
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.72no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameno dataBristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)1 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price$130 $749

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25-45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3470 2.11
FX-9830P 2.14
+1.4%

FX-9830P outperforms Xeon X3470 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3470 3258
FX-9830P 3306
+1.5%

FX-9830P outperforms Xeon X3470 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 2.14
Recency 1 July 2009 1 June 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P.

Be aware that Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation processor while FX-9830P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and FX-9830P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470
AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 710 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 108 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3470 or FX-9830P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.