Atom x7-Z8700 vs Xeon X3470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3470
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.14
+146%

Xeon X3470 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18692547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency2.05no data
Architecture codenameno dataCherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes162
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3470 2.14
+146%
Atom x7-Z8700 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3470 3268
+146%
Atom x7-Z8700 1328

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 0.87
Recency 1 July 2009 2 March 2015
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

Xeon X3470 has a 146% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom x7-Z8700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon X3470 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-Z8700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3470 and Atom x7-Z8700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3470
Xeon X3470
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
Atom x7-Z8700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 730 votes

Rate Xeon X3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 21 vote

Rate Atom x7-Z8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3470 or Atom x7-Z8700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.