EPYC 7552 vs Xeon X3430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.48
EPYC 7552
2019
48 cores / 96 threads, 200 Watt
33.04
+2132%

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon X3430 by a whopping 2132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2075107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3615.45
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,025
Current price$50 $1747 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7552 has 4192% better value for money than Xeon X3430.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.35 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156TR4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.48
EPYC 7552 33.04
+2132%

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon X3430 by 2132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3430 2286
EPYC 7552 51104
+2136%

EPYC 7552 outperforms Xeon X3430 by 2136% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 33.04
Recency 1 July 2009 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 7552 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3430 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and EPYC 7552, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
AMD EPYC 7552
EPYC 7552

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 135 votes

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7552 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or EPYC 7552, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.