Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Xeon X3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1976not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameno dataMerom (2006−2008)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)28 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$286

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0375V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156PPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3450 2853
+287%
Core 2 Duo T7200 738

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3450 435
+101%
Core 2 Duo T7200 216

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3450 1480
+333%
Core 2 Duo T7200 342

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 28 July 2006
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 34 Watt

Xeon X3450 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T7200, on the other hand, has 179.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X3450 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo T7200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3450 and Core 2 Duo T7200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3450
Xeon X3450
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Core 2 Duo T7200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 292 votes

Rate Xeon X3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 103 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3450 or Core 2 Duo T7200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.