Core i3-3210 vs Xeon W3530
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W3530 outperforms i3-3210 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1852 | 2108 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.62 | 0.12 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | $120 |
| Current price | $133 (0.1x MSRP) | $159 (1.3x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W3530 has 417% better value for money than i3-3210.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.06 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 3072 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 94 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 65 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | - | - |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| My WiFi | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | no data | - |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 3 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W3530 outperforms Core i3-3210 by 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon W3530 outperforms Core i3-3210 by 38% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-3210 outperforms Xeon W3530 by 16% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon W3530 outperforms Core i3-3210 by 51% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.98 | 1.44 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 1 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Cost | $999 | $120 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 55 Watt |
The Xeon W3530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3210 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W3530 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-3210 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3530 and Core i3-3210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
