Xeon X3330 vs W3520

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1891	2146
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.11	0.04
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	no data
Release date	March 2009 (15 years ago)	1 July 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$404	no data
Current price	$70 (0.2x MSRP)	$824

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W3520 has 7675% better value for money than Xeon X3330.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	8	no data
Base clock speed	2.66 GHz	2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.93 GHz	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	45 nm	45 nm
Die size	263 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	68 °C	71 °C
Number of transistors	731 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-13625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA1366	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Demand Based Switching	+	-
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FSB parity	no data	-
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330 are enumerated here.

VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	24 GB	no data
Max memory channels	3	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W3520 outperforms X3330 by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.90	1.36
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Xeon X3330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---