Xeon X5470 vs W3520

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads
1.90
+0.5%

W3520 outperforms X5470 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18571860
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.110.34
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)no data
Release dateMarch 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2008 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$404no data
Current price$85 (0.2x MSRP)$208

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W3520 has 815% better value for money than Xeon X5470.

Technical specs

Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C63 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3520 1.90
+0.5%
Xeon X5470 1.89

W3520 outperforms X5470 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3520 2937
+0.5%
Xeon X5470 2921

W3520 outperforms X5470 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.90 1.89
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 120 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Xeon X5470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Xeon X5470
Xeon X5470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 95 votes

Rate Xeon X5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Xeon X5470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.