AMD EPYC 7313P vs Intel Xeon W-3275M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Xeon W-3275M
25.15

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-3275M by 9% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking165145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.3117.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years old)15 March 2021 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$913
Current price$9030 (1.2x MSRP)$1581 (1.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313P has 648% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Technical specs

Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.75 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.15
EPYC 7313P 27.37
+8.8%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-3275M by 9% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3275M 38622
EPYC 7313P 42032
+8.8%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-3275M by 9% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3275M 1203
EPYC 7313P 1360
+13.1%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-3275M by 13% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3275M 11736
+25.3%
EPYC 7313P 9368

Xeon W-3275M outperforms EPYC 7313P by 25% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 25.15 27.37
Recency 3 June 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Cost $7453 $913
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 155 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 62 votes

Rate Intel Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.