Xeon D-2795NT vs W-3275

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads
26.87
+46%

W-3275 outperforms D-2795NT by a considerable 46% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking156292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.03no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years ago)1 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data
Current price$5391 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads5640
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.75 MBno data
L2 cache28 MBno data
L3 cache38.5 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2579
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+no data
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6432
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 26.87
+46%
Xeon D-2795NT 18.40

W-3275 outperforms D-2795NT by 46% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3275 41554
+46%
Xeon D-2795NT 28463

W-3275 outperforms D-2795NT by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.87 18.40
Recency 3 June 2019 1 January 2022
Physical cores 28 20
Threads 56 40
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 110 Watt

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2795NT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Xeon D-2795NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2795NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Xeon D-2795NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.