Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon W-3265M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.28
+26.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.86

Xeon W-3265M outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking252381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.90no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency9.8245.59
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L2 cache24 MB8 MB
L3 cache33 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 21.28
+26.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 33800
+26.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26787

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3265M 997
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2230
+124%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3265M 7681
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10715
+39.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.28 16.86
Recency 3 June 2019 13 June 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has a 26.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 485.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3265M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3265M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.