EPYC 7373X vs Xeon W-3265M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking253not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.91no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency9.82no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan-X (2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 22 March 2022
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 17.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.